No. 19-374
Floyd Hamilton Byrns, Jr. v. Maryland
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-law criminal-record due-process ex-post-facto expungement forgery legal-remedy plea-bargaining post-facto-punishment retroactivity sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a person who pled guilty to forgery of a check less than $100.00 in 1987, be punished Post Facto and denied due process for an expungement 32 years later?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Should a person who pled guilty to forgery of a check less than $100.00 in 1987, be punished Post Facto and denied due process for an expungement 32 years later?
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent State of Maryland to respond filed.
2019-09-27
Waiver of State of Maryland of right to respond submitted.
2019-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Floyd Bryns, Jr.
A. Donald C. Discepolo — Discepolo LLC, Petitioner
State of Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Respondent