No. 19-378
Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.
Response Waived
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal court abused its discretion granting costs to Respondents-Defendants despite their unclean hands and without any consideration of the public interest?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the federal court abused its discretion granting costs to despite their unclean hands and without any consideration of the public interest? . 2. May a Federal Court ever grant a motion for relief from judgment under FRCP 59(b) in a case involving legal error? : 3
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-02
Waiver of right of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. to respond filed.
2019-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)
2019-06-28
Application (19A5) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 22, 2019.
2019-06-25
Application (19A5) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 18, 2019 to August 22, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
City and County of San Francisco, et al.
Boris Reznikov — Office of San Francisco City Attorney, Respondent
Boris Reznikov — Office of San Francisco City Attorney, Respondent