Whether the court of appeals correctly applied a subjective, officer-focused test to determine whether a suspect was interrogated for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the court of appeals correctly applied a subjective, officer-focused test to determine whether a suspect was interrogated for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 2. Whether a defendant who seeks to demonstrate that a prior conviction is not a categorical match for federal sentencing purposes must point to an actual state-court prosecution illustrating the state crime’s overbreadth.