No. 19-391

Assured Guaranty Corp., et al. v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-24
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: automatic-stay bankruptcy-code bond-debt debt-enforcement municipal-bankruptcy municipal-bond-market special-revenues
Key Terms:
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 11 U.S.C. § 922(d) mandates that there is no automatic stay of debt enforcement actions with respect to pledged special revenues

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In 1988, Congress amended the Bankruptcy Code to provide a specific regime for the treatment of bond debt secured by “special revenues” in municipal bankruptcies. Among other amendments, Congress added an exception for “special revenues” to the provisions that otherwise establish a “stay of enforcement of claims against the debtor” during the pendency of bankruptcy proceedings. 11 U.S.C. §922(d). That exception mandates that filing a bankruptcy petition “does not operate as a stay of application of pledged special revenues.” Congress’s stated goal was to ensure that special revenue bondholders retain their “unimpaired rights to the [special] revenue pledged to them” even after a municipality has declared bankruptcy. S. Rep. No. 100-506, at 12. The question presented is: Whether 11 U.S.C. § 922(d) mandates that there is no automatic stay of debt enforcement actions with respect to pledged special revenues. (i)

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-11
Reply of petitioners Assured Guaranty Corp., et al. filed.
2019-11-25
Brief of respondents Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors to respond filed.
2019-10-24
Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.
2019-10-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 25, 2019.
2019-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 24, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 24, 2019)

Attorneys

Assured Guaranty Corp., et al.
Neal Kumar KatyalHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al.
Martin J. BienenstockProskauer Rose LLP, Respondent
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Neal David MollenPaul Hastings LLP, Respondent
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Laura Elizabeth ApplebyChapman and Cutler LLP, Amicus