Whether the Rule of Law applies to the Respondent regarding the use of chemical cleaning and air-freshening products in aircraft cabins

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Introduction: With great respect this case is about Life, Liberty and the pursuit for Righteousness : at 30,000 feet. Federal Law Fact: Federal Rule of Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124, forbids harmful materials onboard the Aircraft. National/Global Significant Fact: The Respondent ; approves the use of “Chemical Substance Products” ; inside the Aircraft Cabin for cleaning and air: freshening, with no oversight providing verification and certification with an Official Government Document “Certificate of Compliance” that the Respondent, in fact, is following the Rule of Law. . THE PETITIONER RESPECTFULLY PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: a 1. Doés the Rule of Law apply to the Respondent? : : : 2. Is the Respondent in compliance with the . statutes? : , 3. With respect, can the Petitioners Brief have ' merit to be granted when, the Federal Question above, ; ; to this case was never answered by the Lower Courts? ; 4. With respect, can the Petitioners Brief have : merit to be granted when, the Wrong Law was _ applied by the Lower Courts? Wrong Law: Americans with Disabilities Act ; (ADA) ORDER 6/24/2019 JUDGMENT ENTRY 11/20/2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 11/20/2018 . —$— TY MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 2/15/2018 Note: The Correct Law for respectful judicial ; review is Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124. : 5. With respect, can “STRICKEN” Evidence at co App.119a-196a, based on the Wrong Law applied by the Lower Courts, have merit to grant the Petitioners : Brief, to review the EVIDENCE, applying the Correct : Law: Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124? 6. With respect, can missing COMPLAINT Docket : ; information, communicated and reproduced at App. : 94a-100a, from a Government Agency regarding an ; unanswered Federal Question, have merit for granting : a Petition? ; 7. With respect, do you believe products used to clean and air-freshen the Aircraft Cabin should be . transparent, no secrets, with complete list of ingredients ; , made available, for a better Air-Quality Environment? . _8. With respect, can exposure to Chemical Cleaning and Chemical Air-Freshening Products used inside , ; the Aircraft Cabin approved by the Respondent, with ’ no Federal Government Oversight to Indoor Air: _ Quality Standards, (other than “No Smoking”), have merit for granting a Petition? ; 9. With respect, can our United States of America 116th Congress, provide the Respondent with an ; Official Government Oversight Document: “Certificate of Compliance”, for the Global Air-Traveling Public, . including a complete “Product List with 100% of the Ingredients”, made available for “Safety and Health in the Aircraft Cabin”? A respectful basic Civil and iii Human ‘Right to Know”, as well as “Need to Know” in this particular and unique environment. 10. With respect, can NATIONAL/GLOBAL : SIGNIFICANCE have merit for granting a Petition? : / iv : LIST OF PROCEEDINGS U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit — Case No. 18-4251 ; Christina Alessio, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. ' Date of Order: June 24, 2019 ; . US. Federal District Court of Northern District of Ohio Case No. 5:17-CV-01426-SL ; Christina Alessio, Plaintiff v. ; United Airlines, Inc., Defendant. : Date of Order Striking Plaintiff Filings: November ~. 15, 2017 , : Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss: February 15, 2018 : Date of Memorandum Opinion Granting Motion to ; Dismiss Amended Complaint and Entry of Judgment: November 20, 2018.