Introduction: With great respect this case is about Life, Liberty and the pursuit for Righteousness at 30,000 feet.

Federal Law Fact: Federal Rule of Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124, forbids harmful materials onboard the Aircraft.

National/Global Significant Fact: The Respondent approves the use of "Chemical Substance Products" inside the Aircraft Cabin for cleaning and air-freshening, with no oversight providing verification and certification with an Official Government Document "Certificate of Compliance" that the Respondent, in fact, is following the Rule of Law.

The Petitioner Respectfully Presents the Following Questions:

1. Does the Rule of Law apply to the Respondent?

2. Is the Respondent in compliance with the statutes?

3. With respect, can the Petitioners Brief have merit to be granted when, the Federal Question above, to this case was never answered by the Lower Courts?

4. With respect, can the Petitioners Brief have merit to be granted when, the Wrong Law was applied by the Lower Courts?

5. With respect, can "STRICKEN" Evidence at App.ll9a-196a, based on the Wrong Law applied by the Lower Courts, have merit to grant the Petitioners Brief, to review the EVIDENCE, applying the Correct Law: Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124?

6. With respect, can missing COMPLAINT Docket information, communicated and reproduced at App. 94a-100a, from a Government Agency regarding an unanswered Federal Question, have merit for granting a Petition?

7. With respect, do you believe products used to clean and air-freshen the Aircraft Cabin should be transparent, no secrets, with complete list of ingredients made available, for a better Air-Quality Environment?

8. With respect, can exposure to Chemical Cleaning and Chemical Air-Freshening Products used inside the Aircraft Cabin approved by the Respondent, with no Federal Government Oversight to Indoor Air-Quality Standards, (other than "No Smoking"), have merit for granting a Petition?

9. With respect, can our United States of America 116th Congress, provide the Respondent with an Official Government Oversight Document: "Certificate of Compliance", for the Global Air-Traveling Public, including a complete "Product List with 100% of the Ingredients", made available for "Safety and Health in the Aircraft Cabin"? A respectful basic Civil and Human "Right to Know", as well as "Need to Know" in this particular and unique environment.

10. With respect, can NATIONAL/GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE have merit for granting a Petition?

Whether the Rule of Law applies to the Respondent regarding the use of chemical cleaning and air-freshening products in aircraft cabins