Whether the saving clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) allows defendants to seek relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the grounds that a subsequent statutory interpretation decision, previously unavailable on direct appeal, renders their sentence unlawful

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the saving clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) allows defendants to seek relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the grounds that a subsequent statutory interpretation decision, previously unavailable on direct appeal, renders their sentence unlawful. ii RULE 14.1(b)Gii) STATEMENT e Lamont DeJuan Higgs v. United States, Nos. 3:16CV-1759-M, 3:138-CR-0461-M (1), United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Judgment entered November 30, 2017. e Lamont DeJuan Higgs v. Wilson, No. 3:18-CV2537-M, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Judgment entered November 26, 2018. e Lamont DeJuan Higgs v. Wilson, No. 18-11581, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Judgment entered June 20, 2019. There are no additional proceedings in any court that are directly related to this case.