No. 19-403

Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas v. Texas

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: agency-interpretation federal-indian-law fifth-circuit gaming gaming-prohibition gaming-regulation indian-gaming indian-gaming-regulatory-act multi-circuit-conflict national-indian-gaming-commission statutory-interpretation tribal-lands tribal-sovereignty trust-lands trust-statutes
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether IGRA authorizes gaming on tribal lands previously governed by trust statutes that prohibited gaming

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED On August 18, 1987, Congress passed acts codifying relationships with two distinct, sovereign Indian tribes: the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head of Massachusetts and the Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribe of Texas. Each Act—the Settlement Act for the Wampanoag, and the Restoration Act for the gaming on tribal lands to the same extent it was prohibited by the States in which those tribal lands were located. In 1988, Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), which “provideld] a statutory basis for the operation of gaming by Indian tribes” and established “Federal standards for gaming on Indian lands.” 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721. The National Indian Gaming Commission, the agency entitled to interpret IGRA, concluded that IGRA permitted both the Wampanoag and Alabama-Coushatta to conduct bingo operations on each Tribe’s lands. The question presented is: Whether IGRA authorizes gaming on tribal lands previously governed by trust statutes that prohibited gaming, as the National Indian Gaming Commission, the Department of the Interior, and the First Circuit have concluded, or not, as the Fifth Circuit has held.

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-20
Reply of petitioner Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas filed.
2019-12-09
Brief of respondent State of Texas in opposition filed.
2019-10-25
Brief amici curiae of National Congress of American Indians, National Indian Gaming Association, and USET Sovereignty Protection Fund filed.
2019-10-25
Brief amicus curiae of Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Tribe of Texas filed.
2019-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2019.
2019-10-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-26
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas.
2019-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)
2019-08-14
Application (19A172) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 23, 2019.
2019-08-12
Application (19A172) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 22, 2019 to September 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas
Allyson HoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Allyson HoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
National Congress of American Indians, National Indian Gaming Association, and USET Sovereignty Protection Fund
Daniel David Lewerenz — Amicus
Daniel David Lewerenz — Amicus
State of Texas
Kyle Douglas HawkinsTexas Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Kyle Douglas HawkinsTexas Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Tribe of Texas
Brant C. MartinWick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP, Amicus
Brant C. MartinWick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP, Amicus