No. 19-406

Marilu F. Touma v. The General Counsel of the Regents, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: abuse-of-power ada ada-violation americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights conspiracy-to-interfere-with-civil-rights disability disability-discrimination due-process jurisdiction medical-discrimination medical-treatment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether UCLA Medical Center violated the ADA and Civil Rights when it denied medical treatment to a disabled woman, provided substandard services, and abused her physically and mentally

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; . 1. Whether, UCLA Medical Center violated the America with . Disability Act (ADA); Title II of the America with Disability of 1990 (ADA) and Civil Rights (SAC) when the hospital and its employees denied medical treatment to a disable woman; provided her substandard medical services; denied ; her stabilization at the Emergency Room (ER); abused her physically and mentally; accused of a criminal act; among other horrendous claims with the intention to destroy her | , persona and reputation; because she OBJECTED the abusive behavior and REJECTED inferior medical service? 2. Whether, All decisions made in petitioner’s case at the Southern District Court and the Central District Court should be VOID for Lack of Jurisdiction; Abused of Power . and Acted in Bad Faith. And Whether these deceitful . actions constitute a VIOLATION of petitioner’s Due Process; Deprivation of Civil Rights; Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights; violation under The America | . | ; ii. with Disability Act (ADA); Title II of the America with . Disability of 1990 (ADA) and other violations determine by . this court? 8. Whether, The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Abused ; its Power when FAILED to review petitioner’s VIOLATION of Due Process; Acted in Bad Faith when affirmed the lower courts’ decisions and concluded petitioner’s case is . . Frivolous; when lower courts lack jurisdiction in this case. : And Whether those deceitful actions constitute a 7 VIOLATION of petitioner’s Due Process; Deprivation of Civil Rights; Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights; | violation under The America with Disability Act (ADA); Title II of the America with Disability of 1990 (ADA) and other violations determine by this court? : : | | . | iii.

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-01-24
Application (19A784) denied by Justice Kagan.
2020-01-14
Application (19A784) to suspend the effect of the denial of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-03
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Marilu F. Touma
Marilu F. Touma — Petitioner
Marilu F. Touma — Petitioner