No. 19-407
Alexander Christian Miles v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-the-writ abuse-of-writ aedpa contract-law criminal-charges criminal-procedure plea-bargaining post-conviction-relief
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Immigration Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the abuse of the writ doctrine or the AEDPA precludes a successive petition for post-conviction relief
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the abuse of the writ doctrine or the AEDPA precludes a successive petition for postconviction relief when the government, years after a defendant’s conviction, amends its criminal charges to keep him convicted of a completely different crime than what he originally pleaded guilty to? 2. Whether plea bargaining criminal defendants deserve the same degree of protection under contract law as civil litigants who are parties to commercial contracts?
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2019)
2019-06-04
Application (18A1262) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2019-06-04
Application (18A1262) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 30, 2019.
Attorneys
Alexander C. Miles
Alexander Christian Miles — c/o Law Offices of Don P. Chairez, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent