No. 19-419
Antonio L. Saulsberry v. Randy Lee, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process habeas-corpus jury-trial precedent retrial sixth-amendment verdict
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial of a defendant on a charge that was submitted to a jury at a prior trial but as to which that jury did not render a verdict
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court’s precedent clearly establishes that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial of a defendant on a charge that was submitted to a jury at a prior trial but as to which that jury did not render a verdict. @
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent Randy Lee to respond filed.
2019-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Antonio L. Saulsberry
Joshua Michael Koppel — Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Petitioner
Randy Lee
Michael M. Stahl — Respondent