No. 19-437
John Paterno v. City of New York, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment causation causative-nexus civil-procedure civil-rights due-process legal-entitlements pleadings procedural-claim standing stigma-plus temporal-proximity
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit erred in applying a temporal proximity test to dismiss a procedural Due Process claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Second Circuit, in a “stigma-plus” case, erred in affirming the District Court’s dismissal of Petitioner's procedural Due Process claim by applying a temporal proximity test to find, as a matter of law, no causative nexus between defamatory statements concerning petitioner and the denial of the Plaintiffs legal entitlements? 2. Whether the Second Circuit erred in not according the pleaded deprivations the deference they were entitled to under this Court’s precedent?
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-16
Waiver of right of respondents City of New York, et al. to respond filed.
2019-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2019)
Attorneys
City of New York, et al.
Jane L. Gordon — Respondent
John Paterno