Whether an ERISA Plan Administrator may enforce reimbursement provisions against an ERISA beneficiary that are contained only in a Summary Plan Description and where no ERISA Plan document containing the reimbursement provisions exists

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an ERISA Plan Administrator may enforce reimbursement provisions against an ERISA beneficiary that are contained only ina Summary Plan Description and where no ERISA Plan document containing the reimbursement provisions exists, in contravention of this Court’s holding in Cigna Corp. v. Amara, 563 U.S. 421 (2011), that enforceable terms within ERISA must be contained in the Plan document and cannot be contained only in a Summary Plan Description. ii PARTIES TO THE CASE Robert Hoch, Petitioner, was the DefendantAppellant below. MBI Energy Services, Inc., Respondent, was the Plaintiff-Appellee below. STATEMENT OF