No. 19-457
Xia Bi, et al. v. Terry McAuliffe, et al.
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fraud fraud-pleading misrepresentation pleading reliance reliance-element rule-9b standing
Key Terms:
ERISA Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
ERISA Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure imposes a particularity requirement for pleading the reliance element of common law fraud claims
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure imposes a particularity requirement for pleading the reliance element of common law fraud claims. 2. Whether foreign investors’ exclusive reliance on misrepresentations contradicting English-language investment memoranda renders their reliance unjustifiable as a matter of law. 3. Whether company statements are attributable to the executives that are in charge of the company’s daily affairs.
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Xia Bi, et al.
Marina Vladimir Bogorad — Gerard Fox Law, P.C., Petitioner