City of East Cleveland, Ohio, et al. v. Charles Hunt, et al.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion when it denied Petitioners' Motion to Bifurcate the trial
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion when it denied Petitioners’ Motion to Bifurcate the trial. 2. Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion when it advocated for a Minimum Dollar Verdict and Recused a Juror for cause. 38. Whether the Trial Court Abused its Discretion when it Refused Admission of an Expert Witness’s Impairment Opinion. 4. Whether the Trial Court Erred to Petitioners’ Prejudice When it Allowed Patent Juror Misconduct in the Courtroom. 5. Whether the Verdict went against the Manifest Weight of the Evidence when Testimony showed that Charles Hunt When Facing a Malfunctioning Traffic Light did not look to the Left, in the Direction of the Oncoming Police Car, Prior to Entering the Intersection. 6. Whether the Trial Erred to Petitioners’ Prejudice in finding that Officer Carroscia was not on an Emergency Call and failing to Allow the Special Immunity Defense as set forth in R.C. 2744.02(B)(1)(a).