No. 19-479

Carol M. Kam v. John B. Peyton, Jr.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: associate-judge judicial-authority judicial-misconduct probate-court probate-law rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-jurisdiction state-court-rulings state-law void-orders
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two Void 'proposed' State Court Rulings?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two Void [not voidable but, void] “proposed” State Court : Rulings produced by a former Associate Judge, who ; failed to acquire authority from the Judge of Record for the Dallas County Probate Court or the State Probate . Court Judge, as required by State Law, to enter a Dal: ; las County Probate Court and who failed to obtain a . sign-off of his rulings from the Judge of Record within ; 30 days of their creation, as required by State Law? ek . : : For the record, John B. Peyton Jr., Associate Judge who created the now expired Proposed Orders, which ; remain unsigned by the Judge of Record, has been removed as a Judge by the State of Texas as the State has deemed him to be “unfit.” ii . .

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-25
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-14
Waiver of right of respondent John Peyton to respond filed.
2019-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)

Attorneys

Carol Kam
Carol M. Kam — Petitioner
Carol M. Kam — Petitioner
John Peyton
John J. ButrusDallas County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
John J. ButrusDallas County District Attorney's Office, Respondent