No. 19-499
Response Waived
Tags: appeals-court-error appellate-review clear-error criminal-procedure district-court-error evidence government-evidence government-surveillance healthcare-billing loss-amount loss-calculation medical-fraud patient-records sentencing standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in determining that the district court did not clearly err in accepting the government's assertion that Mr. Posada only saw 20 patients a day, three days a week, such that the loss amount attributable to Mr. Posada was $4,087,736?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals erred in determining that the district court did not clearly err in accepting the government’s assertion that Mr. Posada only saw 20 patients a day, three days a week, such that the loss amount attributable to Mr. Posada was $4,087,736?
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Henry Posada
Andrew Richard DeVooght — Loeb & Loeb LLP, Petitioner
Andrew Richard DeVooght — Loeb & Loeb LLP, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent