No. 19-5002
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 4th-amendment cell-phone-evidence conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel life-sentence search-and-seizure warrantless-search
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the cell phone evidence was the product of a warrantless search and seizure and/or an illegal detention; and thus, whether this evidence can be used to convict Petitioner to life in prison?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION 1: Whether the cell phone evidence was the product of a warrantless search and seizure and/or an illegal detention; and thus, whether this evidence can be used to convict Petitioner to life in prison? QUESTION 2: Whether a Defendants 14th Amendment rights are violated and whether its a conflict of interest when a Defendant files Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel claim and the Defendant's trial attorney is now District Attorney over Defendant's habeas corpus writ?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)