No. 19-5003
Roberto Cruz-Olavarria v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process heightened-scrutiny judicial-discretion offense-seriousness sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-review statutory-maximum supervised-release
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is a need for extensive justification and heightened scrutiny when imposing and reviewing sentences at the statutory maximum
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether there is a need for extensive justification and heightened scrutiny when imposing and reviewing sentences at the statutory maximum. 2. Whether this Court should address an apparent circuit split and determine that the seriousness of the offense is not pertinent to supervised release revocation proceedings.
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Roberto Cruz-Olavarria
Rachel Brill — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent