Whether the Texas Supreme Court erred in affirming the lower court's dismissal of the petitioner's case, which violated the petitioner's due process rights and the Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTION PRESENTED F.B.1. has violated In this case the Texas Supreme Court did not reject, but accepted the decision of the Fourth Court of Appeals in affirming the judgement of the Judge of the Trial Court Hearing motion to dismiss under Tex. R. Civ. P. Rule 91a, instead, entering a decision in conflict with the Due Process Clause which prohibits state and local governments from depriving persons of life, liberty, without a fair procedure, departing further from accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, and sanctioning such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court’s supervisory power ? Did the Justices of the Fourth Court of Appeal violate Mr. Salazar’s rights to due process of law and the Fourteenth Amendment: With right to evidence, . with right to fair trial, with right to impartial Judges and Justices, and with right to no influence by business — financial interests; was a fair legal due process BLOCKED? Violating Title 18 U.S.C. 371 and section 241 The legal tactics and devices that the F.B.I. are popular against gangs i