No. 19-5017

Shanta Phillips-Berry v. Louisiana, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts appeals civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights district-court due-process equal-protection evidence-presentation fair-trial judicial-discretion jurisdiction legal-procedure standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the petitioner a fair trial by jury and the opportunity to present evidence against the respondents

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned Pro Se Litigant counsel of record for Appellant The following listed persons and entities as described in the (S CIR. R. 28.2.1) have an ; interest in the outcome of this case. : DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: State of Louisiana 8585 Archives Ave Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809 . (225)925-6006 Patricia Blackwell Scurlock 14136 W. Hoffman Rd. Hammond, Louisiana 70454 (504)975-7686, (318)697-1996 or (504)887-7859 Attorney For: Patricia Blackwell Scurlock Raspanti Law Firm, LLC ; 3900 N. Causeway Blvd. : Lakeway One, Ste. 1470 Metairie, Louisiana 70002 (504)836-7330 Appellant Shanta G. Phillips-Berry 202 Clemson Street : Kenner, Louisiana (504) 635-8239 Pro Se Litigant ‘s/ Shanta G. Phillips-Berry Pro Se Litigant of Record for Appellant \ PRESENTED ARGUMENT 1. The district court abused its discretion by not relying on the erroneous legal premise that a citizen(s) of the state of Louisiana and this great country deserves a fair trail by jury. Not allowing evidence to be presented in a timely manor as stated in the : constitution. Leaving appellant and citizen(s) open to attacks, injuries, and other hateful actions bought on by Appellee(s) and others. 2. Assuming — if this Court of our country would have properly addressed this matter the outcome would have been resulted, by evidence presented to trail and jurors. In failing to properly comply with its own laws and rules of the United States of America appellant was force to file appeal. ee i JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT Appellant appeals from (1) October 01, 2018 as to case terminated September 18, 2018 by Judge Martin L.C Feldman of the US. District Court Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans) (2) case is connected to 4 other cases; This court of Louisiana transferred case(s) it to different Magistrate Judges, Judge Karen Wells Roby, Judge Jane Triche Milazzo, and Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, hr. August 27, 2018 thru August 30, 2018 which confused appellant as to location case(s). (3) Order denying as “MOOT” entered on October 03, 2018 by Judge Martin L. C. Feldman, appellant replied timely filing a Notice of Appeal, This Court has jurisdiction over the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 iii

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana State to respond filed.
2019-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2019)

Attorneys

Louisiana State
David Glen SandersLouisiana Department of Justice, Respondent
David Glen SandersLouisiana Department of Justice, Respondent
Shanta Phillips-Berry
Shanta G. Phillips-Berry — Petitioner
Shanta G. Phillips-Berry — Petitioner