Jennifer Perez v. Paul Grant Dwyer
DueProcess
Are people with disabilities more likely to be protected or discriminated when regarding parental stigma
QUESTION PRESENTED Are people with disabilities more likely to be protected or discriminated when regarding parental stigma by, the Guardian ad Litem, as well as the Father of our son we share where the sexual and physical abuse happened under “Daddy’s” custody around 50 to 60 times however my disabilities were intentionally used to deflect on the truth of what happened in the father’s home and the father, guardian and Judge did use that as an intentional discrimination and re-victimized a child who himself has been diagnosed and also classifies under the American Disability Act, how my 14" amendment by "the state government on behalf of the Eleventh Circuit Judge and her prejudicial bias violated my due process as well, that the burden of proof is on the petitioner and the Judge went of strictly hearsay and did not allow me to show my clear convincing evidence to substantiate all the false allegations, are these federal acts that are punishable as actual crimes when reviewed properly has judicial abuse occurred in so many ways, if it is okay for the petitioner who is an attorney and the guardian ad litem to also invent medical mental conditions that | do not suffer from and although | had a doctor(s) note proving otherwise dated August 10, 2018 and the Emergency Hearing was August 31, 2018 did | meet any of . those alleged diagnoses, although opposing counsel was reading my clear, convincing and supporting of ‘ my actual disabilities that | was on my regimen for and Judge Manno-Schurr stopped her and said that was enough, if based on generalizations about persons with disabilities, is it okay to violate my Constitutional! and Civil Rights because of my disabilities as a mother and chose hearsay over the truth that supported my truth and evidence? That | was not allowed not allowed to introduce and was : abruptly interrupted by the Judge, is it okay when a minor child comes forward to and admits that they . have been sexually and physically abused including under the supervision of the other parent known as the father Mr. Paul G. Dwyer, Esq. in this case about 50 to 60 times? To create Parental Alienation that is known as child abuse when it under false pretense as in this instance, with a No Contact Order, to cover ‘ ‘ up a sex abuse scandal of our minor son who when | had him assessed was diagnosed concluded had (309.81/F43.10) Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, (309.89/F43.8) Other specified trauma — and stressor related disorder, (314.01/F90.2) Attention — disorder, combined presentation, (313.81/F91.3) Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Which the father, and the guardian pretended not to know about although | had an IEP and a 504 form portion from the assistant Vice Principal filled out and we were scheduled to go to the doctor to have the portion properly filled out by the physician in early : September however the guardian could not make it and the father and | were supposed to go together, instead in the emergency hearing they pretended | made these illnesses up and they knew nothing of this therapist and “all these other specialist” they made up although we were all copied in this email. Did the Eleventh Circuit Court reach opposite conclusions on the las vs. another? If the abuse of the ; Judicial Power is a direct violation of our Constitution, my constitutional rights, Civil Rights Law and treated inhumanely? 3