Whether the United States Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia is in conflict with the circuit courts on the issue of preclusion

QUESTION PRESENTED , 1. WETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS IN "CONFLICT" WITH THE CIRCUT COURTS CASE IN [ MICHAEL D. HURD V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 864 F.3d 671 (DC APP) ON THE “ISSUE OF PRECLUSION" WHEN THE COURT DISMI SSED HIS [SECTION 1983 ] ON IDENTICAL SIMULAR GROUNDS." | 2. DID THE"UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS"FOR THE DISTRICT ‘OF COLUMBIA VIOLATE PETITIONERS "EQUAL PROTECTION"OF THE LAW WHEN THE COURT DENIED PETITIONERS[SECTION 1983] ON ‘ IDENTICAL AND SIMULAR GROUNDS[IN]MICHAEL D. HURD V. DISTRICT . OF COLUMBIA 864 F.3d 671 (DC APP)'ON THE "ISSUE OF PRECLUSION." ; 3. WETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA “ABUSED ITS DISCRETION"WHEN THE COURT DISMISSED THE "PERSONAL CAPACITY"CLAIM IN HIS_SECTION 1983 _ THAT WAS NEVER RESPONDED TO OR DENIED OR ADMITTED BY RESPONDENTS." PURSUANT TO RULE 8 b 6 , FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES." o PARTIES oo THE PETIONER OLIVER BOLING IS A DC CODE PRISONER "HOUSED" : IN THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON. THE RESPONDENTS, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et. al.,