No. 19-5029
Frederick Tyrone Calhoun v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment administrative-law civil-procedure due-process eminent-domain equal-protection just-compensation private-property standing statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government's seizure of private property without just compensation violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION The Constitution requires the federal government to obtain an indictment and jury verdict before imprisoning a person. While on federal supervised release Frederick Calhoun entered an Alford plea to a state charge. The state court imposed no prison time. The federal court, however, (without an indictment or jury verdict), revoked the supervised release and imposed 4 years of imprisonment. Does the Constitution require an indictment and jury trial before imposing a prison sentence for violating supervised release?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent