No. 19-5030
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment proportionality sentencing
Key Terms:
Punishment
Punishment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the twenty-one year sentence imposed by the state trial court violated the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the twenty-one H ear sentence imposed by the state trial court violated the Eighth Ame ment ban on cruel and unusual punishments? | | i | | | | | | | i | i | | | i i I | | if | it | i | | | | | { 1 i | ! 1] Hi { | | |
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-15
Brief of respondent State of Ohio in opposition filed.
2019-08-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2019.
2019-07-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 31, 2019 to August 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2019)
Attorneys
State of Ohio