No. 19-5035

Calvin James v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights due-process evidence probable-cause search-and-seizure search-warrant standing trial witness
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do officers need consent to search private property without a search warrant?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Do offieses n&éd Consent Seaech PR vALe Peateet¥ £, Bod worthoudt A S¢aech WARRANT 2 2.) Peony ™ ewe 2 a wap oedg the Probate Causs | evidence | we4ne ss JV 4 FiKeed me 7 TRIBL Ze Sh pl Aepae ? ° 7 3) Ferm my und, ‘ C2s4+ ang , n CAn Be A : For 72 Aeuns, okie asug td Ain mend etd ti Ah suf WAKKANT . S 4 me 7% Teine lorp BIER 72 4 sree whorl “ors Wn A ea Fal, Teg Poeeed eho, OOP BARR nL 50 fore , Dt and Convichren LAwPul 2 ° “A oF Dd } Pad in Fe sae kop peel States # ¥ FA! a 20 frrdy 2 Ya So 2 429 PRES0N CAA+ Ze tusice Pee-bes p2 Jy TINE Or: Ens Corr eet? Wall 7 WAS on 4i Jy With Shops Pheials Bre Vas SAME OP? En se Pkior dy my TaditmentOthe Peds dors int Saf Violate the Lée G2 Doubls Teopnely ? )By haw In Ligath dhble Reresént mYISEl?PPeo! Wels gs: S& Corege.g ALL ‘Te and my Fub/ ce DOFEndex WERE Paving Sumé Serious Clignd Key Tssy ES, Z Spoke with mar; speads Tidpe gal Ayff 4; sould neh s few Counse/ fy a, Stated no on Tan 17 2019 te Lea, point ™E new Counss| Ind Since T dont AaAve & Hejl Oe asl Bot lel of Reoressnd myse le, : b) Fran the outside Low King tt olozs nf Shls BEAAVIOR S8Em RR Tadlice dad Upl sy Fy) 2 — | ; CAVA | n Ske STATE wpe A li bust whose phepewent pt dd pnd declss. A VV dle Perk SEER Ho TELL a Weudyt All bhses Vie labiny tf She Consk taken Lim 2 Bit LIAS _OK LR3 LadhieE £ . . . [</ l2/7 l Sine Chop BRO LZ Kecteved 2 letter. teu! Nis Yedibin Laing JP was Keesived. Appt! $0, 2019 Bal re dixrsal Fok Ye Fo Nowiny 1 KS Mans. The Case must Piste _Xbviswed —_ Yt Malded Lpades Cam iP Mygaedt _ Kuk LL 62 Shis Cet shatss 2 Cxbiorpxt Con be Auuitwecl to <8. Lis Chadliy, iq dhs ilad Lid a bes Bw a2 tyyesal. hairy That tha Chaise? Jack _ CU Atien Tkem LDEKmA L” Agesllits Pach 2, a Kequne Z Poms Lite Bex nind Lan ph his Cbs? ny Los3_ IK dos Shis Bad fo Be mads ¥2b)i:c Bret? $erm dhe SCcajctod tod Usue) Chivse 6? Tidicial PRocssdinyy ts zo Call To Ais Cob LyBR US Pauw? (las 1) aie ey) Cat WAS 6f. mousa kth Pottw pe BMY Kevis wed _ | 77 CIZUZN TAMES (Fvs305) Lord CAxt pe Pin Ie. Sbupansh, ep 3)os | air ZI LDU THES f. oe nd _— EE

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Calvin James
Calvin James — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent