No. 19-5044

Adrian Moon v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-07-03
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abortion civil-rights constitutional-law due-process precedent standing standing-civil-procedure-due-process-takings-civil
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where did the Supreme Court rule that the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overruled Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED he wy the Qow visleles nedeyere. L. and, . Where SU pro rule announe & UE Ne > Kx, Tomes Version ( leprae, tu) “Blsms (0S. a “ Oo wok rove mp emrnente& anes clo no} Woe Salon be Devil («. caler) iv plove Pre naire Loves of [he XA eg dey Crootol oF tre \ear ens Bn te en Vows 4. e. as announeed, un ee Mee 10-95 Domes Uorsion we) (UL ? poner v Sakon Me Dewl (os plu Role kes Wade LAS tery deus \yprnreen S (rel 23 Fla) Soak Lore seve ra ok oe abormiinahern ag | deere “ ~ C )* lew be Dei U(g rulee.) Vi cledte US phere “ od V\a hate toes s »Phuw se Lanner, , prnceane) Ldnegevh ws wl. Ge skondeny 99 ~ Apher Weberoreruel ee Be ‘eae Khe Wessels Salces “9 me pone x2 Bile, Nor ler) a7 cor (secre JEN). B ele ; . :

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2019)

Attorneys

Adrian Moon
Adrian D. Moon — Petitioner
Adrian D. Moon — Petitioner