No. 19-5044

Lower Court: California

Docketed: 2019-07-03

Status: Denied

Type: IFP

IFP

Tags: abortion civil-rights constitutional-law due-process precedent standing standing-civil-procedure-due-process-takings-civil

Latest Conference: 2019-10-01

Question Presented (from Petition)

Devil violates natural and
Where SATAN the
Car drer
Law and
rule annouved in New
Kug James Version(deorae lll) "Palsns 105:15
Do not touch
y
harm my prophets
Where
natral
laws
Al moghty
fa
the
creator of the
Heavens
Eartw
e
verseas announe
Kigs James Vorsion (dearee ) (el1?
in the New
where Saton the Deil
Natural
Law
by
huumen's
(mate and Ferate) that
Homosexual
G
abomunation
is
no
Cμ
New King Jomes V
anroanced
the
Version
decre o
E
9
violato U.5.
Safan
where
constitutonal and
Natakal taws when
Salsely
and imprisoning
aCauSanG
fetiton
bondage)
Kdnopped
without
bail.
Sov
din
Alpha
Heferosexonal
aS
a
male
Yeshua the
for
messiah
announced
in the Bitle,
as
New Kirg James
Vorsion
decree 1411)

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where did the Supreme Court rule that the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overruled Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

2019-08-15

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.

2019-05-22

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2019)

Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Proof of Service

Attorneys

Adrian Moon

Adrian D. Moon — Petitioner