No. 19-5049

Michael Wilson v. Shawn Hatton, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-right constitutional-rights district-court due-process habeas-corpus jurists-of-reason procedural-ruling sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of a denial of a constitutional right, and whether jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution would "jurists of reason" find it debatable of whether the ; ' petition states a valid claim of a denial of a éonstitutional right, and would that "jurists of reason" find it debatale of whether the district court was correct in it's procedural ; ruling. .

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael Wilson
Michael Wilson — Petitioner
Michael Wilson — Petitioner