Jimmie Darnell Dixon v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the lower court erred denying COA on the claim of insufficient evidence where petitioner sufficiently proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the offense, in violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . QUESTION 1. Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA on The Claim Of , Insufficient Evidence Where Petitioner Sufficiently Proved By A Preponderance Of The’ Evidence That He Was Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity At The Time Of The Offense, In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution QUESTION 2. The Lower Court Erred Denying COA on Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, in Violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution QUESTION 3: The District Court Erred Denying Mr. Dixon A Hearing, in Violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution 8 .