No. 19-5067

Jimmie Darnell Dixon v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-insanity-defense-due-process-si due-process evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel insanity-defense insufficient-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred denying COA on the claim of insufficient evidence where petitioner sufficiently proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the offense, in violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . QUESTION 1. Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA on The Claim Of , Insufficient Evidence Where Petitioner Sufficiently Proved By A Preponderance Of The’ Evidence That He Was Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity At The Time Of The Offense, In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution QUESTION 2. The Lower Court Erred Denying COA on Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, in Violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution QUESTION 3: The District Court Erred Denying Mr. Dixon A Hearing, in Violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution 8 .

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2019-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Dylan C. AlgeEast Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Jimmie Darnell Dixon
Jimmie Darnell Dixon — Petitioner