Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeal(s) decision was in contrary with U.S. Supreme Court precedent

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL(S) DECISION WAS IN CONTRARY WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT, BY FAILING TO LIBERALLY CONSTRUE THE MAILBOX RULE WHEN CONSIDERING FEDERAL HOLIDAYS, CALCULATING THE ONE YEAR TIME LIMITATION PERIOD, UNDER 28 U.S.C.A. 2244(d)(1). Mc Neil v. U.S., 508 U.S. 106, 113, 113 S.ct. 1980 (1993). II. WHETHER THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL(S) DECISION VIOLATED PETITIONER(S) DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, THE PRINCIPLE OF PARTY PRESENTATION BY ALTERING THE DISTRICT COURT(S) DECISION THROUGH A IMPLICIT CONCLUSION OF THE FACT(S), “THAT BENEFITED THE NONAPPEALING PARTY. Greenlaw v. U.S., 554 U.S. 237, 243-44, 128 S.ct. 2559 (2008). i