No. 19-5069

Chapel Thompson v. Mark Garman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation buck-v-davis civil-procedure co-defendant court-of-appeals due-process habeas-corpus incriminating-evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-standard procedural-analysis standing
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court of appeals followed the dictates of this court's decision in Buck v. Davis, explaining that the COA stage is not coextensive with a merits analysis?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOLLOWED THE DICTATES OF THIS COURT'S DECISION IN BUCK V. DAVIS, EXPLAINING THAT THE COA STAGE IS NOT COEXTENSIVE WITH A MERITS : ANALYIS? : : : WHETHER THE-COURT OF APPEALS WENT BEYOND WHAT THE COA STAGE DICTATES WHEN IT DETERMINED THAT PETITIONER'S CLAIM RELATED TO AN INCRIMINATING LETTER PRESENTED . : AT TRIAL AGAINST THE ALLEGED CO-DEFENDANT WITHOUT INSTRUCTING THE JURY IT COULD “NOT BE USED AGAINST PETITIONER, WAS UNTIMELY? ; :

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-07
Waiver of right of respondents Garman, Supt., Rockview, et al. to respond filed.
2019-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2019)

Attorneys

Chapel Thompson
Chapel Thompson — Petitioner
Chapel Thompson — Petitioner
Garman, Supt., Rockview, et al.
Susan E. MoyerDistrict Attorney's Office, Respondent
Susan E. MoyerDistrict Attorney's Office, Respondent