Can the Congress only create tribunals inferior to the Article III section 1 one supreme Court?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Can the Congress only create tribunals inferior to the Article III section 1 one supreme Court? : ; Is there, within the phrase “The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress”, two independent Supreme Courts? Can the phrase “The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress” be found in any other place within any of the fifty United States Codes other than only in 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) and in 28 U.S.C. 2071 (a)? Does 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) and 28 U.S.C. 2071(a) create a legislative Article III controversy beyond the political question and public rights doctrines of popular State and Federal governments? Does each of the two independent Supreme Courts have their own independent Law-making and Rule-making Powers? Does the two independent Supreme Courts represent two independent Governments of two independent Countries? Is the “Supreme Court” within the phrase “The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress” actually the “one supreme Court” within Article III section 1 of the 1787 Constitution of the United States? Is the one supreme Court’s judicial Powers superior in all respects to the Judicial powers of all State and Federal courts? Is the one supreme Court’s jurisdictional provisions found in Article III section 2 clause 2 of the 1787 Constitution of the United States and in section 13 of the 1789 First Judiciary Act? Does the judicial Power and jurisdictional provisions of the “one supreme Court” take preference over and predominate the other judicial powers and jurisdictional provisions of both the State and Federal courts? Have the one supreme Court’s judicial Powers and jurisdictional provisions remained good and unchanged for over 229 years? Does the Rules prescribed by the “Supreme Court” in 28 U.S.C. 2071{a) have the controlling and governing affect as ordered by that “Supreme Court”? In exceptional circumstances of all “cases” and “controversies”, brought by or effecting “Ambassadors, other public Ministers, their Domestics or their 1 Questions one supreme Court March 7" 2019 June 20" 2019 domestics Servants and those in which ‘a State shall be Party”, are all the courts and persons of popular National government required by the supremacy of the Rules of Law of the Land to follow and to give unquestionable adherence and affect to the Article III section 1 one supreme Court’s determinations both as to Law and Fact in all civil and criminal matters within the Article III section 1 one supreme Court’s independent sources of Jurisdiction, derived from Article III section II clause II of the Constitution of the United States and, but not limited to, sections 9, 11, 13,14, 16 and 34 of the 1789 First Judiciary Act? . Does any court or person of popular National government have authority to seek or sanction any departure or violation of the original 1787 Constitution : of the United States through the legislation of popular National government? Are all State and Federal Judges required by the supreme law of the land to give respect to all of the limitations, restrictions and provisions of the ' original Constitution of the United States above all else. Are the Amendments to the original 1787 Constitution of the United States in the nature of a Statute? \ Did the 14%» amendment create a constructive jurisdiction against Mankind beyond the incidental powers of popular National government? Does the appropriate, ultimate law-making authority within this Country . have the Right to determine and resolve all “Cases and Controversies of a civil or criminal nature” by the “supremacy of the Rules of Laws of the Land’, leaving the “Supreme Court of the United States” with Article III standing and the “virtually unflagging” Duty to compel all courts of popular Government to ; protect, follow and enforce the supremacy of the Rules of Laws of the Land” in all “Cases and Controversies within the territorial Limits and independent sources of Jurisdiction both as to Law and Fact