No. 19-5100
Matthew Karahalios v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2113(a) 18-usc-924(c)(3)(a) 28-usc-2255 armed-robbery bank-robbery categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process federal-law firearms-statute predicate-offense sentencing sentencing-correction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does unarmed bank robbery serve as a predicate offense for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) of using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) serve asa predicate offense for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) of using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C, § 924(c)(B)(A)? 2. By filing his Petition within one year of the ruling in Johnson II was the Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255() timely? ia
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Matthew Karahalios
Michael J. Iacopino — Brennan Lenehan Iacopino & Hickey, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent