No. 19-5128

Robert Vincent Salcedo v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split direct-appeal discretionary-sentencing discretionary-sentencing-authority non-retroactive-amendment nonretroactive-amendment remand-for-resentencing resentencing retroactivity sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a non-retroactive amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines takes effect after a defendant is sentenced but while his direct appeal is pending, may a remand for resentencing be ordered to permit the district court to consider the amendment under its discretionary sentencing authority, as the First, Sixth, and Eighth Circuits permit, but the Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits prohibit?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED When a non-retroactive amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines takes effect after a defendant is sentenced but while his direct appeal is pending, may a remand for resentencing be ordered to permit the district court to consider the amendment under its discretionary sentencing authority, as the First, Sixth, and Eighth Circuits permit, but the Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits prohibit? 1

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Robert Vincent Salcedo
Jonathan David LibbyOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent