No. 19-5142

Charles Anthony Ball v. Mike Slagle

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process federal-appeal federal-rule free-speech judicial-conflict meloy standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit err on an important federal question by entering its decision/judgment, which is in conflict with the decision of another United States Court of Appeals and this Court concerning the 6th Amendment rights violation under the recent ruling on Meloy?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Div tHe Unrtes States Cover of APPEALS FoR THE FoURTA CIRC tr ERR OW AN IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTION. BY ENTERING iTS Dée1s10N/FUDEMENT, WHICH Is Ww CONFLICT” wins THE DECISION OF aAusmen Unrrer Stares Court of Appears awd Tas Cover CONCERNING THE 6 Amendment Ki@urs ylolaTien WwdsRr THE RECENT RULING ON Meloy ? Dip THE Unires Staves Court of Appencs ror tHe Rue Grower ERR ON AN IM PORTANT FEDERAL QUESTION BY ENTERING ITS BECISloN/TUPGMENT, WHICH IS IN CONFLICT WITHTHE BECISION OF Anommon Unter States Court at Appracs axe tis Court ConCewine PeTTNERs Ruce OO Monon ow a STATECULPABLE DEFECT tA PETITIONERS FEDERAL APPEAL PRaCEPDinGs ?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent Mike Slagle to respond filed.
2019-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2019)

Attorneys

Charles A. Ball
Charles Anthony Ball — Petitioner
Charles Anthony Ball — Petitioner
Mike Slagle
Clarence Joe DelForge IIIN.C. Department of Justice, Respondent
Clarence Joe DelForge IIIN.C. Department of Justice, Respondent