No. 19-5150
Irvin Junior Phillips v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-924e apprendi-rule apprendi-v-new-jersey criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process indictment-requirements prior-conviction prior-convictions sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 2. Whether a prior conviction must be alleged in the indictment before a defendant may be subjected to enhanced punishment under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2019)
Attorneys
Irvin Junior Phillips
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent