Whether intellectual property should be treated differently from physical property under a statute of limitations

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION 1 The Plaintiff-Appellee does not find the value of the Virginia statutory limitation law Va. Code § 8.01-243(B) holds true for intellectual property. Intellectual property is different from physical property. An intellectual text is intellectual property. Intellectual property should not be included property by the definitions of property in the statute of limitations. The ruling is unjust . because it deprives the Plaintiff-Appellee of her unalienable and intrinsic right to her own work. ¢ The 14th Amendment of the US Constitution says the Plaintiff-Appellee has “unalienable . rights” and “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property”, and the right to the “equal protection” of them (74th Amendment, Section 1 of US Constitution, July 9, 1868). * The Declaration of Independence says the Plaintiff-Appellee has “unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776). , ¢ The first Amendment assures the Plaintiff-Appellee to the right to “freedom of speech” and : “exercise of” her religion. : The essays comprising the religion and spirit in the exercising thereof should be ordered returned to her. The theft the Defendant-Appellees are lying they did not carry out denies the Plaintiff-Appellee the right to the “freedom of speech” of her own essays and the freedom to her religious philosophy and religious belief the Plaintiff-Appellee was writing about. The Plaintiff-Appellee was then studying and preparing to be a teacher. On her behalf is the PlaintiffAppellee graduated with a Master of Education in Learning and Technology and can be employed as an educator/teacher or professor. Work as a regular employee for someone else is hard to find because the Plaintiff-Appellee is moderately deaf in both ears. The Plaintiff-Appellee, however, is an accomplished author and needs her essays to make a living at writing. Meanwhile, the DefendantAppellees use and sell the work that is intellectual property. The Defendant-Appellees have been awarded an unjust time bar over intellectual property, even though the Defendant-Appellees claim, perjuriously, their association with the Plaintiff-Appellee never happened and the property, although it is intellectual property, never existed to them so they. did not steal it.. The essays comprising the religion and spirit in the exercising thereof : ' should be ordered retumed to the Plaintiff-Appellee because the Defendant-Appellees did steal it. The criminal activities in which the Defendant-Appellees with DARPA helping Aspen Systems, Inc. were involved, sabotaging the aircraft at MROs and aboard the aircraft carriers and selling documents to spies, represent the real characters of the Those crimes might come under the statute of limitations to the court, but how can the court say this when “[t]here is no statute of limitations for treason or for federal terrorism charges”? According to Title 18 of the United States Code, §238]. Treason: : “There is no statute of limitations for federal crimes punishable by death, nor for certain federal crimes of terrorism, nor for certain federal sex offenses. 2 Prosecution for most other federal crimes must begin within five years of the ; ’ commitment of the offense” (United States Code, §2381). : "The Plaintiff-Appellee is telling the truth. The Plaintiff-Appellee is not a liar when the Plaintiff-Appellee states the Defendant-Appellees robbed her. The Defendant -Appellees were traitors who sold documents to spies . If the court can award the desperate need of the time bar statute of limitations to those the Plaintiff-Appellee sees no reason the court does not use the statute’s corrected interpretation for intellectual property because the PlaintiffAppellee is not a liar. The Plaintiff-Appellee is not guilty of perjury. The Defendant-Appellees most ‘certainly are guilty of perjury. ; : ; The document comprising the stolen essays