Whether a formal objection after pronouncement of sentence is necessary to invoke appellate reasonableness review of the length of a defendant's sentence

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether a formal objection after pronouncement of sentence is necessary to invoke appellate reasonableness review of the length of a defendant’s sentence. 2. Whether a sentence produced by a guideline that is not empiricallybased, illegal-reentry guideline §2L1.2, is entitled to a presumption of reasonableness on appeal. No. ___ In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2018 GEOVANNY ANTONIO LOYOLA-VILLEGAS, PETITIONER, also known as Loyola Geovanny Anto Villegas, also known as Giovanny Loyola, also known as Geovanny Antonioloyo Villegas, also known as Geovanny Antoni Villegasloyola, also known as Geovanny Anton Loyola-Villegas, also known as Geovanny Loyolavillegas, also known as Geovanny Loyola, also known as Geovanny A. Loyola-Villegas, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Geovanny Antonio Loyola-Villegas asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 12, 2019.