Is a plaintiff's prima facie case of discrimination because of race, national-origin and retaliation, combined with sufficient evidence for a reasonable factfinder to reject the employer's nondiscriminatory explanation for its decision, adequate to sustain a finding of liability for intentional discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Isa plaintiff's prima facie case of discrimination because of race, national origin and retaliation, combined with sufficient evidence for a reasonable factfinder to reject the . employer’s nondiscriminatory explanation for its decision, adequate to sustain a finding of liability for intentional discrimination under Title VI! of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? 2. Isa plaintiffs prima farcie case of an employer creating and sustaining a hostile work ; environment combined with sufficient evidence for a reasonable factfinder to reject the ; employer’s nondiscriminatory good faith explanation adequate to sustain a finding of : liability for intentional discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? 3. Isa plaintiff's prima facie case of discrimination when an employer intentional uses : unverified here say from a bias source with known racist tendencies combined with sufficient evidence for a reasonable factfinder to reject the employer's nondiscriminatory explanation for its decision, adequate to sustain a finding of liability for intentional discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?