Does a District Court Judge engage in a Fraud Upon The Court

question presented is: Does a District Court Judge engage in a Fraud Upon The Court by participating in the theft of a Petitioner’s Opposition to a Respondent’s Motion To Dismiss during the proceedings, where the Judge intentionally misrepresents the official record in the Final Order, covering up for the disappearance of a Petitioner’s Opposition. In United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) the Seventh Circuit states “The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.” In Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), the Supreme Court ruled and reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.” The question presented is: Has Due Process and the “appearance of justice” been satisfied when District Court personnel with the assistance of the District Court Judge, steal, obstruct, and dispose of a Petitioner’s Opposition to a Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss effectively denying a Petitioner the right to Due Process and opportunity to oppose a .soa Respondents Motion. ao —— OE