No. 19-5195

Cleo Hines v. Cindy Griffith, Warden

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment circuit-court circuit-court-of-appeal civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection federal-case-law legal-uniformity
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Equal Protection Clause require the law to treat identically situated persons in the same way, as required by the 14th Amendment, or only when an issue is established in federal case law by the same Circuit Court of Appeal with the claim in question being presented before it?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution requires the law to treat identically situated persons in the same way. The 14th Amendment forbids a state to "deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." U.S. Const. Amend. XIV. The 5th Amendment requires the federal government β€œto obey the same equal protection standards as the states. Question: Does the Equal Protection Clause require the law to : treat identically situated persons in the same way, as required : by the 14th Amendment, or only when an issue is established in federal case law by the same Circuit Court of Appeal with the claim in question being presented before it? β€˜ . (i)

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent Cindy Griffith to respond filed.
2019-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Cindy Griffith
Julie Marie BlakeMissouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Cleo Hines
Cleo Hines — Petitioner