No. 19-5196
Malcolm Omar Robinson v. United States
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act breaking-and-entering burglary criminal-law fourth-amendment fourth-circuit rehaif-v-united-states remand sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether North Carolina Breaking and Entering is broader than Armed Career Criminal Act burglary
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether North Carolina Breaking and Entering, which criminalizes, among other things, the breaking or entering into “any other structure designed to house or secure within it any activity or property,” is broader than Armed Career Criminal Act burglary. Il. Whether the Fourth Circuit’s judgment should be vacated and this case remanded for further review in light of this Court’s recent opinion in Rehaif v. United States, No. 17-6560 (June 21, 2019).
Docket Entries
2019-11-08
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-10-07
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-14
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2019)
2019-04-23
Application (18A1076) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 11, 2019.
2019-04-17
Application (18A1076) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 12, 2019 to July 11, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Malcolm Robinson
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent