Should US Supreme Court resolve denial of due process and equal protections when full release of requested clerk records was denied, then Writs of Mandamus, Injunction & Prohibition were dismissed two (2) days later due to lack of records when unchallenged, timely affidavit of inability to pay is on file and when orders now set new precedence affecting similar situated individuals nationwide?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Should US Supreme Court resolve denial of due process and equal protections when full release of requested clerk records was denied, then Writs of Mandamus, Injunction & Prohibition were dismissed two (2) days later due to lackof records when unchallenged, timely affidavit of inability to pay is on file and when orders now set new precedence affecting similar situated individuals nationwide? II. Should US Supreme Court resolve increasing national issue of use of judicial system to retaliate and violate constitutional rights with over 20 states lacking any protections as well as significant limitations and discrepancies between states with anti-SLAPP legislation? II. Should US Supreme Court resolve when lower courts fail to perform duty or abuse its discretion in issuing and allowing orders to stand which violate constitutional rights, when the record was sufficient and which emboldens harm to similar situated pro se and individuals with inability to pay nationwide? IV. Should US Supreme Court resolve when the integrity of the judicial system is undermined by order to destroy evidence and remove court records from public view absent compliance with statutorily defined duty? V. Should US Supreme Court resolve when lower courts fail to perform duty or abuse its discretion in refusing to grant hearings by Pro Se party for months after motions filing and diligent efforts to schedule or not at all, issuing order prohibiting filing of any documents, then issuing orders within seven (7) days or less of trial or not at all, then issuing and refusing to nullify orders issued during statutorily required stay? VI. Should US Supreme Court resolve lower courts issuance of orders striking Entity Answer when jurisdiction is challenged but unanswered and undetermined by the court, even when business entities lack attorney representation,and when claims against business are retaliation for officer of business exercising constituional right of freedom of speech and participation in government? VII. Should US Supreme Court resolve when lower court awards appeals costs against party with unchallenged, timely inability to pay on file, which is contrary to law? Page 2 of 85