No. 19-5220

Hernardo Medina-Villegas v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-claims due-process prejudice reasonableness sixth-amendment constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-standard prejudice reasonableness-standard sixth-amendment standard-of-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial and appellate counsel's performance fall below an objective standard of reasonableness and prejudice the petitioner?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED a This Case. involves the Trial and Appellate Counsels Performance falling Below — _ an objective Standard of Reasonableness, that prejudice the Petitioner. . 1, Did The Trial and Appellate Counsels Performance Fall Below An Objective Standard of Reasonableness; Did The Deficient Performance Prejudice The Defendant? ~ 2. Did Petitioner Conviction and Sentence were Obtained In Violation of his : | Sixth, Amendments Right of The United State Constitution? ‘ ; 3. Under the Circumstances of the Underlying Case, Can A Reasonable jurist 90“ Find the District Court's Assessment of Medina's Constitutional Claims Debatable * , or Wrong? : ; , 3 . INDEX TO APPENDICES . 7

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)

Attorneys

Hernardo Medina-Villegas
Hernardo Medina-Villegas — Petitioner
Hernardo Medina-Villegas — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent