No. 19-5224

Lee Chang v. Wisconsin

Lower Court: Wisconsin
Docketed: 2019-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation due-process evidence evidence-translation evidentiary-hearing fair-trial fundamental-fairness ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-enforcement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was recorded evidence by law enforcement and presented by the prosecutor given in a timely manner as well as can it be considered a Brady violation due to recorded evidence not being fully translated?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question(s) Presented . Was Recorded Evidence By Law Enforcement and Presented By The Prosecutor Given In A Timely Manner As Well As Can It Be Considered A Brady Violation Due To Recorded Evidence Not Being Fully Translated? ‘Was Trial Counsel Ineffective And Such Ineffectiveness Deprive Chang of Fair 'Due Process' Pursuant To Sixth Amendment of United States Constitution? _Should Prior Statements By Z.Y. Be Admissable Under 'Fundamental Fairness' . Doctrine Because They Contradict Statements Law Enforcement And The Prosecutor Wishes To Use And Such Statements Were Never Truly Evaluated Under An Evidentiary Hearing? : : ; . _ I The Supreme Court of United States |.|_+___02

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent Wisconsin to respond filed.
2018-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Lee Chang
Lee Chang — Petitioner
Lee Chang — Petitioner
Wisconsin
Sara L. ShaefferWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Sara L. ShaefferWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent