No. 19-5246
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-1203 924(c) certificate-of-appealability constitutional-law crime-of-violence criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-certificate-of-appealability due-process eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus sentencing statutory-interpretation united-states-v-davis
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' denial of a Certificate of Appealability should be vacated in light of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether, in light of this Court’s most recent decision, in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), which abrogated the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal’s en banc decision in Ovalles v. United States, 905 F.3d 1231 (11% Cir. 2018) (en banc), the Order issued in this case by the Eleventh Circuit denying the movant’s request for a Certificate of Appealability, in reliance upon the now-abrogated Ovalles opinion, should be vacated? i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-09
Reply of petitioner Jason Rosado filed.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-18
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-08-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 18, 2019.
2019-08-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 19, 2019 to September 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)
2019-05-07
Application (18A1111) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 21, 2019.
2019-04-25
Application (18A1111) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 22, 2019 to July 21, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Jason Rosado
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent