No. 19-5255

Frank Lobacz v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 appellate-review court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance judicial-error per-se-ineffectiveness procedural-default second-circuit section-2255 sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington trial-counsel
Key Terms:
ERISA HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit erred in affirming the lower court's denial of Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1, Whéther it was error by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, to affirm the lower court’s denial of Petitioner’s Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 which argued that Petitioner had received ineffective assistance on the part of his trial counsel. : 2. Whether the ineffectiveness of trial covinsel was so negligent that it amounts to per se ineffectiveness. : : 4 oe a :

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)

Attorneys

Frank Lobacz
Frank Lobacz — Petitioner
Frank Lobacz — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent