No. 19-5256
Anthony J. Livingstone v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause confrontation-rights criminal-procedure discovery due-process military-justice military-rules-of-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment special-victims-counsel
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the 6th Amendment right to confront witnesses violated due to a misapplication of MRE 412?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTIONS(S) PRESENTED 1. Was the 6" Amendment right to confront witnesses violated due to a misapplication of MRE 412 by the military judge? 2. Did the prosecutor prejudice the appellant and violate the rules for discovery when she undertook a discovery obligation she would riot normally have and failed to exercise due diligence in executing that obligation? 3. Does the Military SVC (Special Victims' Counsel) program violate the defendant's right to due process?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony Livingstone
Anthony J. Livingstone — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent