No. 19-5261

Jorge Baez v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c certificate-of-appealability conviction criminal-procedure criminal-statute due-process due-process,vagueness,18-usc-924(c),criminal-proce eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus statutory-vagueness united-states-v-davis vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief on his claim that 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague and therefore his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was obtained in violation of due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Questions Presented 1. Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief on his claim that 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague and therefore his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(¢) was obtained in violation of due process. 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred by denying Petitioner a certificate of appealability when the issue was nonetheless being debated among jurists around the country -and has since been resolved in Petitioner’s favor in United States v. Davis, --S. Ct. ---, 2019 WL 2570654 (U.S. June 24, 2019). i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)
2019-05-29
Application (18A1217) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 18, 2019.
2019-05-14
Application (18A1217) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 2, 2019 to July 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Jorge Baez
Aimee FerrerFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Aimee FerrerFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent