Whether the lower court erred in its ruling on the legal issues involved in this case

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : BwelwWy TORT TR waae. SeolT Lacks ‘“ a . Toeals PeMWeq (ORAS Tease BoA os , TRANS VPEMe ASNT, WWET S “ae, Wr CTV EA TEX YAAK Megee TerK re h GH OWL TOVVT BHA Uase@ o¥X AST “AS SQAVSE | BSSSvurT Noe CLOSE larg, | SNVER OF BRVERDEARS pS Vietien BAL Se . SVWRY A VWMS| Sol ice Ac eolV TAT we, Bw SERORU BSsevt® Waegeae§ BA WV SNES] G@ oF BRACE OQTeSomRS VIET Sraoeh Wes SVETUARKT SB Lode WTA rg Boi \ SV* TanesV gery BS WITS SSS | ayes T OVA” BASTWAEN CWor dey aasuece Yow SN oY RaeeWeovurteare SVEXS OQ TAK “WAR, D\LSNSVEY SOM CWA Of8fvee, Cag CR PS Reach) BWA Wew@urs “NUMVSSLEO WR ‘ . . DS SVR Bemermaswaa>r® ec coarse S Ne RAS SSOSPSaM. TONSTWTrA of We US , WRLO SKESTS NEY BEToste BQ geeSoo Cag SV TonwicTad (qn Bay STETe ToAshErkeg, SHY SV Rvasve Be Lekax moacdsmac SSSA Wee eeaed Ta WET CVE. caytt Raeyr F Ws Soe BE VRo Teed ag, Qa , SOS ABH ESTGHoQ TASSAAGAVA |