No. 19-5275
Richard Michael Mathisen v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining post-conviction-relief right-to-counsel sentencing sentencing-hearing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court and Fourth Circuit erred in denying Mr. Mathisen's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2019)
Attorneys
Richard Mathisen
Peter L. Goldman — Saboura, Goldman & Colombo, P.C., Petitioner
Peter L. Goldman — Saboura, Goldman & Colombo, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent